Matter of Hoerst
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) brought a motion before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board), seeking final discipline based on respondent’s criminal conviction. See Rule 1:20—6(e)(2)(i). The DRB recommended that this Court impose a public reprimand, with two members voting to recommend a six-month suspension. Our independent review of the record leads to the conclusion that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for six months.
I
Respondent, Frank J. Hoerst, III, was admitted to the New Jersey bar in 1974. In 1983 the Governor appointed him Prosecutor of Salem…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. TalleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- In Re MirabelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Matter of FarrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Matter of WhitmoreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Matter of IuloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re ImbrianiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. PessolanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Matter of PepeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Matter of AsbellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- In re ObringerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.