Legal Opinion
Faas v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 26, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to indemnify its insureds, Dan Adam and Corinne Adam, in an underlying action entitled Faas v Adam, pending in the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, under Index No. 5174/ 95, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated March 13, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, (2) a judgment of the same court, entered April 26, 2000, which declared that it is obligated to indemnify…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SteinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Bossio v. FiorilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Sallusti v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. PevznerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Halali v. Evanston InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Penn-America Group, Inc. v. Zoobar, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Darling Ferreira v. Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014