Legal Opinion

McCully Et Ux. v. Flanagan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1930No. Appeals 131 and 332PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This bill in equity seeks to have J. C. Flanagan declared a trustee ex maleficio for H. J. McCully as to all the undivided one-half interest in two pieces of real estate described in the bill, hereafter referred to as the Remington property, located on West Liberty Avénue, Nineteenth Ward, Pittsburgh, and the Eberhardt property, located at East and Milroy Streets, Twenty-sixth Ward, Pittsburgh; to compel the conveyance of the one-half interest therein by J. C. Flanagan and Florence Mae Flanagan, his wife, to H. J. Mc-Cully; to order an accounting for all moneys received…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Osterling v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Reynolds v. BolandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Kern v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Cameron, SEC. of B. v. P. Bk. of MaytownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Montgomery Bros. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamberg v. BarskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Potoczny v. DydekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Colonial Tr. Co. (Mccully) v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Edelson v. Bernstein, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API