Legal Opinion
Lelaind v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 2, 2008No. C 06-05870 MHPPublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Antia Lelaind (“Lelaind”) brings this action against defendants the City and County of San Francisco (“City”), the Public Utilities Commission of the City and County of San Francisco (“PUC”), and three individuals employed by the PUC in supervisory and management capacities— Dan Gilman (“Gilman”), Chris Logia (“Lo-gia”), and Herb Dang (“Dang”). She asserts nine causes of action under federal and state law for unlawful employment practices based on her race, color, national origin, gender, and age. Each defendant now moves for…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Day v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Alejandro v. St Micro Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Andrade v. Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.