Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Grayson County

(after stating the facts as above). It appears in the record that the conclusion of the trial court that appellant was liable as determined by the judgment he rendered, notwithstanding the fact that in opening the new road the requirements of articles 6705, 6706, and 6710, R. S. 1925 were ignored, was on the theory that the special road law for Grayson county (10 Gammers' Laws of Texas, p. 722), and not the general road law, controlled in the matter.

Whether the view taken was the correct one or not we will not undertake to determine, for, if it was, we would think the judgment nevertheless…