Legal Opinion
Benford v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 2, 1983No. Civ. A. No. N-79-2386PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*44MEMORANDUM
NORTHROP, Senior District Judge.
Counsel for the Select Committee on Aging of the United States House of Representatives (hereinafter “Select Committee”), who also represent defendants Hamburger, Gardner, Teitelbaum, and Holton (hereinafter “congressional defendants”), filed the subject motion on behalf of the Select Committee to intervene and for a protective order from a subpoena duces tecum served on the Clerk of the House, another of their clients. Although counsel come wearing a different hat, their goal seems to be the same: to prevent plaintiff Benford from discovering…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Committee on Ways & Means of the U.S. House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In Re GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Search of the Rayburn House Office Building Room Number 2113District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Benford v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983
- Cano v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.