Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ellison v. Gambill Oil Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 2007No. COA06-1016Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJackson, Judge

I concur with the majority opinion that plaintiff’s cross-assignments of error are not preserved for appellate review, and I further agree that the evidence in the instant case would support defendants’ requested instruction on the third-party exception to strict liability under the North Carolina Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Control Act (“OPHSCA”), North Carolina General Statutes, sections 143-215.75 et seq. However, I believe that certain defendants — specifically, Gosai and the Mini Mart- — waived the right to such an instruction by not affirmatively pleading and properly arguing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Ugi Utilities, Inc., Docket No. 04-2409-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Skinner v. Preferred CreditSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. In Re the Will of BuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API