Legal Opinion
Hermeling v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1994No. 3-93 Civ. 442PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiff Quantum Corporation’s motion for partial summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, the court grants the motion.
BACKGROUND
This matter involves the alleged invalidity of defendant Rodime PLC’s (“Rodime”) patent, U.S. Patent No. B1 4,638,383 (“ ’383 patent”) entitled “Micro Hard-Disk Drive System”. The patent describes a micro-winches-ter disk drive system designed to meet the demands of a portable computer system.1
In the early 1980’s, Rodime began development of a hard-disk drive system…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hermeling v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994