Clinton Co. v. Schwarz
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Shebidan E. Fby, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Graves
This suit was begun in the Municipal Court February 15, 1910, against Lothar Schwarz, William P. Crockett, C. B. Miller and the Sultana Eemedy Company. The affidavit of claim then filed states that the cause of action is upon a contract for the payment of money, and that the demand is for labor and services performed and materials furnished to the defendants at their special instance and request, as set forth in a ■statement of claim therewith filed.
On February 28,1910, the plaintiff filed an amended statement of claim which sets forth that the plaintiff’s claim is for goods, wares and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Tarbell v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- O. S. Richardson Fueling Co. v. SeymourIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Seymour v. O. S. Richardson Fueling Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Hoyt v. McCallumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902