Legal Opinion

Deininger v. Deininger

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 4-87-558-EPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MAHON, District Judge.

Defendant John Deininger has moved the Court to dismiss Plaintiff Eleanor Deininger’s alleged cause of action. Deininger submits his Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 9(b), 12(b)(2), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Deininger argues that: (1) the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the Defendants in this cause; (2) the Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and, (3) the Plaintiff’s fraud claims are not pled with sufficient particularity. Alterna tively, Deininger requests that this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Kincaid, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. Star Technology, Inc. v. Tultex Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
  3. Stephen E. Jackson v. James L. Kincaid, Jeffrey T. Hills, and Terry M. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API