Legal Opinion
McDonnell v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 8, 1985No. Civ. A. N-82-179 (RCZ)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, TO STAY PROCEEDINGS, AND TO AMEND ANSWER
ZAMPANO, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Frank McDonnell seeks damages against Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“Dean Witter”) and James Reid, formerly a Dean Witter employee, for the alleged mismanagement of his securities account. Plaintiff asserts causes of action under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78o(c) and 78t(a), the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act, Conn.Gen. Stat. §§ 36-470 to 36-502, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thyssen, Inc. v. Calypso Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Lee v. Grandcor Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1988
- State ex rel. Barden & Robeson Corp. v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Holm-Sutherland Co., Inc. v. Town of ShelbyMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Thyssen, Inc. v. Calypso Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.