Legal Opinion

Stewart v. DeMoss

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 24, 1999No. 97-2144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

In this probate proceeding we must decide whether the claimant, Kent Stewart, filed his claim in a timely manner. The district court found he did not and dismissed the claim after the executor had disallowed it on the grounds that it was barred by the statute of limitations. Stewart appealed, and we transferred the case to the court of appeals. The court of appeals reversed, concluding that Stewart had filed the claim in a timely manner. On our further review, we agree with the court of appeals. We therefore affirm the court of appeals decision, reverse the district court’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of TollefsrudSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. First Security Bank & Trust Co. v. VoelkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. City of Hawarden v. US West Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Matter of Estate of GearhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sager v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Pudil v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of David L. ChristoffersenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API