Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell E. Hill

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1992No. 91-5905PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Russell Hill appeals his convictions for bank robbery and armed bank robbery. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I

On February 4, 1991, a grand jury charged Stanley R. Mercer and Hill, in a two-count indictment, with violating both 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and 2113(d). On April 17, 1991, the jury found both men guilty of both charges. The district court sentenced Hill to twenty years’ imprisonment (count one merging with count two), to run consecutively to the sentence that Hill was then serving for state drug and battery convictions in Indiana.

Prior to the trial, Hill made…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Robert ArchibaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. TurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Russell Ledbetter v. Ron Edwards, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API