Legal Opinion

State v. Bowsher

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 22, 2009No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0151-PRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Brad Bowsher seeks review of the trial court's denial of relief on a petition for post-conviction relief he filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., challenging the court’s imposition of consecutive terms of probation. We will not disturb a trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief unless the court clearly has abused its discretion. State v. Watton, 164 Ariz. 323, 325, 793 P.2d 80, 82 (1990).

¶ 2 In 2007 Bowsher was charged in two unrelated indictments with a total of ten felonies. The victims and events in the two cases were distinct.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. PattonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. PakulaArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BowsherArizona Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API