Legal Opinion

State v. Reagan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 14, 1987No. 4774PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of the crimes of sale of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-277 (a), and illegal possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). The conviction followed his conditional pleas of nolo contendere which was entered, pursuant to General Statutes § 54-943/ after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. The defendant claims on appeal that the trial court erred in denying that motion.

At the hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress, the trial court found the following…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Alfonso Sierra-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ReaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. State v. ReaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. State v. ReaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API