Legal Opinion
Welt v. Abrams
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 1993No. 90 Civ. 0085 (RWS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Ruth Welt (“Ruth Welt”), wife of third party defendant Dr. Martin Welt, Ph.D. (“Martin Welt”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment on a promissory note made out to Martin Welt by defendant Alvin Abrams (“Abrams”) and assigned by Martin Welt to Ruth Welt on October 24,1989. Abrams has cross-moved for summary judgment against Ruth Welt with respect to assignment of the Note. For the reasons given below, the motion of Ruth Welt is denied and the motion of Abrams is granted and the complaint dismissed.
Prior Proceedings
Marti…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.