Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc. v. James
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
This Court “shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them; to the end that it may be a government of laws'and not of men.” Ala. Const. 1901, § 43 (emphasis added). In Alabama, separation of powers is not merely an implicit “doctrine” but rather an express command; a command stated with a forcefulness rivaled by few, if any, similar provisions in constitutions of other sovereigns. Amendment 582 to the Alabama Constitution of 1901 reflects this State’s adherence to this command by effectively nullifying any “order of a state court, which requires disbursement of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Edgewood Independent School District v. KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Ex Parte JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002