Legal Opinion
Robert Hampton v. State of Utah Department of Corrections
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 8, 2026No. 1:18-cv-00079Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT HAMPTON, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S [128] Plaintiff, MOTION TO VACATE REFERRAL v. STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF Case No. 1:18-cv-00079-CMR CORRECTIONS, Chief Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Defendant. Before the court is Plaintiff Robert Hampton’s (Plaintiff) Motion to Vacate Referral (Motion) (ECF 128). Defendant Utah Department of Corrections (Defendant) did not file a response to the Motion. Having carefully considered the relevant filings, the court finds that oral argument is not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- George and Betty Lorenz, Cross-Appellants v. Valley Forge Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Louis Branch v. D. UmphenourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Todd David NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Hampton v. Utah Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- Gregory Sockwell v. C. Paul Phelps and Frank BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.