Legal Opinion

Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 11, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-93; Court 12-00020PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

POGUE, Senior Judge:

This is an action challenging an anti-dumping duty rate established by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Defendant”). Currently before the court is a motion from the primary mem bers 1 of the Alliance for Free Choice and Jobs in Flooring (“AFCJF” or “Mov-ants”) 2 seeking amicus curiae status in this action and submitting a proposed ami-cus brief. Mot. to Appear, ECF No. 77 at 1. The court has jurisdiction in the underlying action pursuant to § 516A(a) (2) (B) (i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(B)(i) (2012) and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. John H. Ryan v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  2. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  3. Irving Paper Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API