Legal Opinion
Bledsoe v. Watson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1973No. Civ. 39747PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, J.
Russell Bledsoe, an attorney, filed an action seeking compensatory damages of $3,700 and exemplary damages of $10,000 for “wrongful interference with contractual relations.” According to his complaint, he entered a written contract for legal services with the City of Seal Beach to investigate xirregularities in certain recall petitions and represent the city and individual members of the city council in a mandate proceeding brought by others to compel the city to hold an. election to recall members of the city council. The complaint charged that defendant Watson, acting as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Middlesex Concrete Products & Excavating Corp. v. Carteret Industrial Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- King v. BorgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Brody v. MontalbanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.