Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 2003No. A03A0285PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

After a jury trial, Joel Faulkner was convicted of armed robbery “by use of an article having the appearance of a gun, an offensive weapon.” On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm his conviction.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determine whether the evidence is sufficient, under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). The verdict must be upheld if any rational trier of fact could…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Moody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Prins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. McCluskey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Joyner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Forde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Marlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. State v. IrelandUtah Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API