Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Ayer & Williams, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The fire escape here in question was appurtenant to the portion of the factory building leased by the defendant to Ayer & Williams, Inc. and obviously necessary to the safe occupancy thereof. Therefore, although the defendant retained control of it, the lessees and their employees were entitled to make use of it at reasonable times and for purposes within the contemplation of the parties. The legal principle here involved has been concisely stated as follows:

“ (1) A lessee of premises is entitled to be at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner on those portions of the premises retained…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stevens v. United Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  2. Brookhouse v. Union Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  3. Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  4. Gobrecht v. BeckwithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  5. Hobbs v. George W. Blanchard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLain v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ross v. EichmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Ware v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  4. Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge Authority v. Ham EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API