Legal Opinion

Brouse v. Hauck

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1984No. 3250 and 3251PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

George and Beverly Brouse brought actions against Lee R. Hauck and against Richard and Dorothy Ditzler to quiet title to one-half of the bed of a vacated township road. They contended that they had acquired title by adverse possession or, at least, that they had acquired an easement by prescription with respect thereto. After they had presented their evidence to the court, which heard the action nonjury, a compulsory nonsuit was entered. Thereafter, the court removed the nonsuit with respect to the Brouse claim of a prescriptive easement over the portion of the road abutting the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Francioni v. Gibsonia Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Inn Le'Daerda, Inc. v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Minteer v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Reed v. WolyniecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schlagel v. LombardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Bowser v. Hershey Baseball Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Newell Rod and Gun Club, Inc. v. BauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. McCrery v. ScioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Duncan v. Billman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API