Legal Opinion
Wanner v. Under Armour, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided December 21, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00767Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ERIC WANNER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:18-cv-00767 v. ) ) JUDGE RICHARDSON UNDER ARMOUR, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant Under Armour, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27, “Motion”), supported by an accompanying brief (Doc. No. 27-1). Plaintiff Eric Wanner filed a response (Doc. No. 29), and Defendant filed a reply (Doc. No. 35, “Reply”). For the reasons stated below, the Motion will be denied. FACTUAL BACKGROUND1 On February 23, 2015,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.