State ex rel. Puett v. Musser
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Parke Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.
The appellant’s complaint is in two paragraphs. The first paragraph in substance is that in March, 1888, Norval W. Cummings made an assignment for the benefit of his creditors, by indenture duly recorded, of all his property to the appellee John R. Musser, who duly qualified as trustee with the appellees, Connelly and McCun’e, as his sureties; that with other property so assigned there was a stallion of the value of $375, and which Avas appraised at $350. At the April term, 1888, of the Parke Circuit Court, in an action by said trustee against the relator to recover the possession of said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meacham v. SternesNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Litchfield v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Grubbs v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Lawson v. DeBoltIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Castetter v. State ex rel. BradburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrah v. State ex rel. DyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Peele v. Ohio & Indiana Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902