Letendre v. Currituck Cnty.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Michael and Marie Long, proposed intervenors, appeal the trial court's order denying their motion to intervene. Because defendant Currituck County does not adequately represent the interests of the Longs, we reverse and remand.
I. Background
The background of this case may be found in two prior opinions from this Court. See Letendre v. Currituck County. --- N.C. App. ----, --- S.E.2d ---- (May 15, 2018) (COA17-1108) ("Letendre I "), temporary stay allowed , --- N.C. ----, 814 S.E.2d 111 (2018) ; Long v. Currituck County , --- N.C. App. ----, 787 S.E.2d 835, disc. review dismissed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated & Reidsville Transaction Corp. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Harvey Fertilizer & Gas Co. v. Pitt CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Long v. Currituck Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Councill v. Town of Boone Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.