People v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SELBER, J. *
— People seek relief by way of mandate pursuant to section 1538.5 subdivision (o) of the Penal Code from an order of the respondent court suppressing certain evidence in a criminal action against defendants, Gonzales, Rubio, Esparza and Arketa, who are the real parties in interest herein. Defendants are jointly charged by information with burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.)
On September 4, 1969, at approximately 2 a.m., officers responded to a police radio call indicating a possible burglary in progress at a given residential location. No further details were contained in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. KoucoulesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CantalupoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- People v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.