Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1970No. Civ. 36446PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SELBER, J. *

— People seek relief by way of mandate pursuant to section 1538.5 subdivision (o) of the Penal Code from an order of the respondent court suppressing certain evidence in a criminal action against defendants, Gonzales, Rubio, Esparza and Arketa, who are the real parties in interest herein. Defendants are jointly charged by information with burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.)

On September 4, 1969, at approximately 2 a.m., officers responded to a police radio call indicating a possible burglary in progress at a given residential location. No further details were contained in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. KoucoulesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. CantalupoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. State v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. People v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API