Legal Opinion
Evensky v. Wright
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided December 23, 1968No. Civ. A. Nos. WC 6855-S-WC 6859-SPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORMA R. SMITH, District Judge.
All of the above-styled cases involve the determination of whether the plaintiffs should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis. For this reason, these cases are consolidated under Rule 42(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
On November 25, 1968 affidavits of poverty were filed in each of the above-styled cases. All of these affidavits are identical and state only that the affiant is a citizen of the United States; that he is unable to bear the cost of this proceedings, that he believes he is entitled to redress, and that the nature of the action is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Higgins v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Robert L. Cole v. Lavern Smith, Bernard Danner and Allen VogelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Calvin C. Shobe v. The People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Busch v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- Levy v. Federated Department StoresDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
- In Re KorenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Schweitzer v. ScottDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1979
- Roberts v. I-T-E Circuit Breaker Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.