Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Furrh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 7, 1976No. 8385PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

Judgment was entered in the trial court decreeing that the City of Dallas forthwith issue Don Furrh a “. . . license to operate billiard tables in the business establishments known as Junior’s, 1946 N. Industrial Boulevard, Dallas, Texas; Dandy Don’s, 9736 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas; and The Fair, 5030 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, Texas upon payment of the proper fees . . . .” The City of Dallas has appealed. The trial court’s judgment is reversed and judgment rendered that Don Furrh take nothing by his suit. The opinion of this Court delivered August 10, 1976,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Seaman v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Chemical Bank & Trust Company v. FalknerTexas Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. J. D. Abrams, Inc. v. SebastianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. A.H.D. Houston, Inc. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. Webworld Marketing Group, L.L.C. v. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API