Legal Opinion

McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1986No. C6-85-1740PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

St. Peter Creamery, Inc., hired McCarthy Well Co., Inc., to restore the flow in an artesian well that supplied water to the Creamery. McCarthy Well took measures to increase the flow, including replacement of the well’s pump. The Creamery made partial payment, and McCarthy Well sued to collect the balance. The Creamery counterclaimed, alleging negligence in the installation and removal of the pump. The jury found in favor of the Creamery, and McCarthy Well appeals from the judgment and an order denying a new trial. We affirm.

FACTS

McCarthy Well services and repairs large…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weaver v. American Oil CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Schmuckler v. CreurerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Prichard Bros., Inc. v. Grady Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Hunt v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Hunt v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API