Legal Opinion

United States v. McDaniels

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 2, 1973No. Crim. 72-330PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, District Judge:

By motions to dismiss the indictments and to stay proceedings, defendants challenge the court’s jury selection plan on the ground that the plan results in substantial underrepresentation of both black and poor persons and thus fails to comply with the Federal Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968, 28 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq.

The Jury Selection Act requires that the juries be “selected at random from a fair cross section of the community in the district or division wherein the Court convenes.” 28 U.S.C. § 1861. It does not contemplate that the jury be selected from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. TestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Harry Lloyd DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. State v. AnayaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. United States v. Lorchid Goff, United States of America v. Deola R. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API