Legal Opinion

Wright v. Agelasto

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 15, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error, Agelasto, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Chesapeake Furniture and Wood Working Company, sued Peter Wright in the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk to recover a subscription to fifteen shares of stock of the Norfolk Furniture Company, of the par value of $100 per share, subscribed to upon the condition “that $15,000 bona fide subscriptions are gotten.”

The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit, and a jury being impaneled, found a verdict for the plaintiff and assessed his damages at $1,500-. The defendant moved the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BryanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. Pocahontas Consolidated Collieries Co. v. HairstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. Georgia Power Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  5. Higgins v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API