Geoff Winkler v. Giselle Bennett, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 Geoff Winkler, Case No. 2:26-cv-01001-CDS-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9 v. [Docket No. 181] 10 Giselle Bennett, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 On July 29, 2026, the Court denied Defendant Andrea Rosegreen’s motion to compel the 13 Clerk’s Office to segregate her filings. Docket No. 180. The Court also therein cautioned 14 Rosegreen that her filings must be signed by her herself or by an attorney working on her behalf. 15 See id. at 1. Rosegreen has now filed a “reply,” which the Court construes as a motion to reconsider 16 arguing that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Oliver v. Stimson Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. KXD Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- Eby v. Johnston Law Office, P.C.Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2022