Rosenthal v. Mueller
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
This appeal turns on a simple principle. With respect to the legal phenomenon of “contributory negligence,” the limiting adjective “contributory” is just as significant and just as necessary an element as is the noun “negligence.” Untold thousands of acts of negligence, as purely abstract phenomena, go regularly unnoticed and are legally inconsequential unless they actually contribute to some adverse result.
The appeal arises from a personal injury suit brought by the appellants, Marilyn Rosenthal and Louis Rosenthal, wife and husband, against the appellees, Lee McEvoy Mueller…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Turner v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Lerette v. Director General of RailroadsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Alston v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Major v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Pasternak & Fidis, P.C. v. Recall Total Information Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- McQuay v. SchertleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Woolridge v. AbrishamiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Germain v. NorrisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.