Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. After Six, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1978No. Appeal, No. 842 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Both After Six, Inc., a domestic corporation, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have appealed a resettlement by the Board of Finance and Revenue of After Six’s capital stock tax for its fiscal year ending June 30,1972.

The number and complexity of the statutes governing the imposition of the capital stock tax suggest a preliminary discussion of these provisions. By Section 602(a) of the Tax Reform Code of 1971 (Tax Reform Code),1 72 P.S. §7602(a), a tax at the rate of 10 mills is imposed upon the taxable value of all capital stock of a domestic corporation.2 The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. Fall Brook Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Commonwealth v. Greenville Steel Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. Monessen Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. After Six, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Kostecky v. MATTERNCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Fry Communications, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API