Legal Opinion

Riney v. Doll

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1924No. 24,940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Seward district court; Charles E. Vance, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage. The defense was duress. It was tried to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Riney owned an automobile which he took to Doll, a car painter, to be painted. Without authority to do so Doll drove the car on a trip, had an accident and damaged the car. Riney asked Doll to *27pay or settle the damage. At the time Riney was quarantined at home because of scarlet fever in his family and he told Doll to settle with an attorney whom he named. Doll employed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Wood v. Kansas City Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Williamson v. AckermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Motor Equipment Co. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Western Paving Co. v. SifersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Campbell-Leonard Realtors v. El Matador Apartment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Brane v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Fritchen v. MuellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API