In Re Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED MASTER COMPLAINT
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs have filed a Fourth Amended Master Complaint (“FAMC”), which Defendant seeks to dismiss. The FAMC alleges different claims for two separate groups of plaintiffs: i) the non-incident or “los of use” plaintiffs assert Counts 1-3; and ii) the incident plaintiffs, who are those alleging fires caused by a failed speed control deactivation switch (“SCDS”) in their vehicles, assert Counts 4-5. Defendant seeks dismissal of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Mayer v. MylodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York City Housing Authority v. G-I Holdings, Inc. (In re G-I Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Progressive Northern Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Bossart v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021