Legal Opinion
State Automobile Mutual Ins v. Robinette
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 1933No. 592PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, J.
The first assignment of error is based upon the contention that the petition states no cause of action.
It is conceded by both parties that if the petition merely states a cause of action, predicated upon a contract to issue a policy, or in other words, a contract to make a contract of insurance, the petition is defective. It is conceded as well that a verbal contract of insurance is valid. The Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v Whitman, 75 Oh St, 312. Goodman, a minor, v The Royal Indemnity Co. et, 24 Oh Ap, 357, (5 Abs 115).
It must be admitted that the petition is inartistically…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kolberg v. Central Fruit & Grocery Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Kate S. Henery, as Administratrix of the Estate of J. Harry Henery, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Hoel v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Lambert v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
- The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Kate S. Henery, as Administratrix of the Estate of J. Harry Henery, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956