Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarx, J.

The only question to be determined in this case is whether the automobile owned by the plaintiff was damaged as the result of “theft, robbery or pilferage.” The case is submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of fact from which it appears that the automobile owned by the plaintiff was insured by the defendant under what is known as a “valued fire, theft and transportation” form policy in the amount of $1,600 upon payment of an annual premium of $43.20.

The perils insured against included, to quote the language of the policy, “theft, robbery or pilferage, excepting by any person or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RechnitzMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McCourt v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Rush v. Boston InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Delafield v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Siegel v. Union Assurance SocietyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API