Legal Opinion

Smith v. Landfair

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-1708PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} Ohio’s equine-activities-immunity statute, R.C. 2305.321, provides immunity from liability for harm sustained by an equine-activity participant allegedly resulting from the inherent risk of equine activities. In this case, we are asked to determine when an injured person is a “spectator” and therefore an “equine activity participant” whose claim for damages is barred by the statute.

{¶ 2} Because we conclude that the Ninth District Court of Appeals erred in overturning the trial court’s summary judgment based on its interpretation of the word “spectator,” we reverse the judgment of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. West LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dodd v. CroskeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. KollerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Hopkins v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Tribett v. ShepherdOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API