Legal Opinion

Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the District Court of Payne County j before John E. Burford, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of the Chicago Building & Manufacturing Company v. Pewthers. That case was commenced before the same justice, change of venue taken to the same probate court. The judgments in the probate and district courts are the same in both cases, and the appeal taken in the same manner. And for the reasons stated in that case, the judgment of the district court of Payne county in this case is hereby affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

It is so ordered; and the district court of Payne county is "jhereby…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. VanderbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Clem Oil Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Commonwealth Cotton Oil Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Shuffeldt v. JefcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Wm. Cameron & Co. v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API