Legal Opinion

Wilson Sewing Machine Co. v. Wilson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShipman, J.

This is a plea in abatement upon the general ground that the complaint was not legally served.

*596The plaintiff is a citizen of Connecticut and the defendant is a citizen.of the state of Illinois. On March 19th, 1884, four actions at law were assigned for trial in this court, one being in favor of F. H. Alford against the present defendant, and three being upon endorsed promissory notes in favor of the endorsee, the First National Bank of Chicago, against the makers, said Alford and Charles Dickinson. The defendant was an endorser_ upon each of the notes.

In the case in which Alford was plaintiff,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bishop v. VoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Parker v. HotchkissU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1849
  3. Lyell v. GoodwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1845

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ryan v. EbeckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Baldwin v. EmersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1888
  3. Roschynialski v. HaleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1913
  4. Golodner v. Women's Center of Southeastern Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Gunn v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API