Legal Opinion

Golodner v. Women's Center of Southeastern Connecticut, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 3, 2007No. SC 17660PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the complaint of the named plaintiff, Daniel J. Golodner, alleging custodial interference by the nonresident defendant, Frauke Sawaha, for lack of personal jurisdiction on the ground that she was in Connecticut involuntarily and, thus, was immune from service of process. We conclude that, because the defendant was in Connecticut pursuant to a court order and was defending against a separate child custody action when she was served, she was immune from process. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Knipple v. Viking Communications, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Bishop v. VoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  5. Weidenbacher v. DuclosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. May v. CoffeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Wucik v. PLANNING AND ZONING COM'N OF TOWN OF PRESTONConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Leseberg v. O'GRADYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. North Sails Group, LLC v. Boards & More GMBHSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API