Legal Opinion
United States v. Tzavah Urban Renewal Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 11, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-3647PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LECHNER, District Judge.
The Government has made an application on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for a preliminary injunction to abate a serious health hazard posed by dry asbestos, a known carcinogen and the cause of a debilitating lung disease, asbestosis. Defendants Tzavah Urban Renewal Corporation (“Tzavah”), Pinros/Gar Datsun Investments (“Pinros”), Henry Roth (“Roth”), Sol Mayer (“Mayer”) and Harry Hampel (“Hampel”) (collectively, “defendants”) own and/or operate a building located at 16 Park Place, Newark, New Jersey, formerly known as the Old…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- United States v. B & W Investment Properties and Louis WolfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Anthony Dell'aquillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Anthony Dell'Aquilla, Enterprises & SubsidiariesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- State, Dept. of Envir. v. Scm Glidco Org.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.