Legal Opinion

Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 1969No. 2124PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALDEN, Judge.

Hubert Owens was charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny. Tried by jury, he was found guilty and duly adjudicated and sentenced. He appeals, saying that there was a total lack of evidence to show that the value of the property in question was $100.00 or more. The state concedes that the evidence of value was insufficient. However, the state, by way of avoidance, asserts that Owens is without standing to raise this point on appeal inasmuch as no motion for a new trial was made in the trial court. It is true that such motion was not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Wiggins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Gilbert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mancini v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API