Legal Opinion

Yenchko v. Grontkowski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1956No. Appeals, 299 and 300PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Arnold,

In this action of trespass, tided by the court without a jury, under the Act of 1874, defendants appeal from judgment entered for plaintiffs.

Defendants specifically assign as error the court’s findings on negligence and proximate cause.

In a deteimination of the present matter we must first assert the well established principle in our law that the findings of the tidal court, confirmed by the court en banc, having evidence to sustain them, have the weight of a verdict by a jury, and will not be disturbed on appeal: Jackson & Perkins Company v. Mushroom…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CARLSON v. A. & P. Corrugated Box Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Mushroom Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Leister v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Little v. York County Earned Income Tax BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Naxera v. WathanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API