Legal Opinion
Janicek v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 9, 1982No. 61622PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of murder, assessing punishment at confinement for life, both on the basis of jury verdicts. Proof essential to support the verdict of guilty in this circumstantial evidence case was obtained and developed after a forced entry into the locked residence of appellant, and in ten of his eleven grounds of error appellant complains of the action of the trial court in overruling his motion to suppress that evidence and its fruits. A full statement of events leading up to the challenged entry is necessary to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Brimage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Pine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Roeder v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Tuffiash v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.