Vaughan v. Everts
Supreme Court of Vermont
Writ op Error to reverse a judgment rendered in the county court, in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error.
Read the full summary
Writ op Error to reverse a judgment rendered in the county court, in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error. The writ was made returnable to the supreme court, Rutland county, at the February Term, 1868. The defendant in error pleaded in bar to the writ as follows : “ Aiffl now the defendant, under leave of court, withdrawing all former pleas, pleads anew, and says c that the said plaintiffs in error ought not further to prosecute or maintain their writ of error aforesaid against him, the said Martin G. Everts, executor as aforesaid, because he says, that the said…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Peck, J.
This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment recovered in the county court by the defendant in error, against the plaintiffs in error, at the March term of the county court, 1866. The question arises upon a special demurrer to the plea in bar.
It appears by the plea, among other things, that at the term of th e county court above mentioned, Reuben R. Thrall, one of the plain - tiffs in error, recovered a judgment against one Henry W. Porter for three hundred and ten dollars and' forty-eight cents damages and twenty-two dollars and sixty cents…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Draper v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882