Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fitzpatrick v. Rice

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1956Published

1ConcurrenceGehl, J.

Counsel for plaintiff concede that while the violation of a penal statute constitutes negligence as a matter of law recovery does not necessarily follow, and that to establish liability causal connection between the violation and the injury must be established; it is for that reason no doubt that the cases on the subject are not discussed in the opinion of the majority.

We said in Smith v. Taylor-Button Co. (1923), 179 Wis. 232, 236, 190 N. W. 999:

“It is well settled that although the violation of a penal statute constitutes negligence, nevertheless, in order to constitute liability, there…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Umnus v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Steinkrause v. EcksteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Mullen v. Larson-Morgan Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bunce v. Grand & Sixth Building, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. McNamer v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API