Legal Opinion
Majerle Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 2001No. 99-AA-863PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of the petition of Ma-jerle Management, Inc., for rehearing or rehearing en banc, respondent’s opposition thereto, the consent motions to appear as amici curiae in support of the petition, and the motion of amicus curiae (Apartment & Office Building Association) for leave to file the lodged reply to opposition to petition, and respondent’s opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motions are granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply to opposition to petition. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is granted to the…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Joseph M. Keating v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of California, Ex Rel. California State Water Resources Control Board, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Bell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mushroom Transportation v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Stratmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Majerle Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
4Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Majerle Management Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wilson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017